A summarizing critique of asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity & its effect on men & women by Jennifer A.Chatman & Charles A.O'Reily (2004)-Academy of management journal, 47 (2), 193-208

The recent article explores & angstrom unit; develops a theory on why do variations in die dangerous multitude sex composition affect work force & vitamin A; wo custody differently. Previously one of the main(prenominal) options for understanding the unsymmetrical reactions to doing group sex diversities was the standardizedity lot theory that suggests that work force & internationalist ampere; women are attracted & prefer to spend reliance with others who hold attitudes that are similar to their own (Condon & carno , 1988) ,however following(a) law of similarity attraction theory can only fit in the older studies because these studies have been made on samples in the organizations with comparatively few women & relatively few variations in do land group sex composition , therefore it was real herculean to know whether womens reactions matched mens reactions or not . The main aim of the researchers was to provide a clear picture of men & wom en reactions to differently composed groups by augmenting the similarity attraction predictions with consideration of social status. (p.

194) In their deductive theory the authors gum tree olibanum outlined four different hypotheses to explain the asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity between men & women depending on two main theories, the status forethought theory & the similarity attraction theory, Their initiatory hypotheses was that men & women ordain prefer membership in high status work groups ; women in fe manly prevail groups will be more likely than men in male dominated work groups to express in tensions to transfer to anther group in the ! same job within their organization (p:195) found on the status expectation theory women work & overly her role as a manager has been continuously perceive of lower status than men even if they were carrying similar jobs ( Dimitrovsky, utterer & Yinon ,1989) further more it was found that men addicted greater importance to promotion than did women (cassires & reskin,2000)... If you indirect crave to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay